The European Football Championship, the hot weather, an upcoming movie shooting and several works for award shows paralyse both writing the blog as also doing something for the thesis. Although I read some further articles, wrote a second outline for my professor, started to write and found a more general name for the thesis which is now “Electronic Word of Mouth – Chances and Challenges”.

It’s a little bit more open than “the other names” I had before. On the one hand, this is giving me the opportunity to be less obligatory. On the other hand I have to pay attention that I don’t get lost in the endless spheres of WOM.

We’ll see – in the end I have still to wait for the feedback from my professor who should have gotten my outline a week ago. I hope it didn’t get stuck in his spam-filter. Tomorrow I’ll send him a reminder which I forgot today.

Let’s see.

.x.

A book that gve me a very good overview about WOM is Connected Marketing, edited by Justin Kirby and Paul Marsden.

Connected marketing (which I haven’t heard ever before) is an umbrella term for viral, buzz and word of mouth marketing. I just read single chapters, but I think it’s going to help me in the ongoing process.

Book:

Connected Marketing

Justin Kirby, Paul Marsden

Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0-7506-6634-X

.x.

Just a second ago I sent my first outline for my master-thesis to my professor. It was comparatively easy to outline the theoretical part explaining WOM in general, but going into detail with the practical part didn’t get me much further. I think I’ve still got to do some research in this direction.

If my feeling is right, I think I’ll find the “storyboard” for the practical part in the book Groundswell by Chalene Li and Josh Bernoff. But to be sure, I first have to go through it and read it. That will take some time.

On Monday I’ll give my professor a call to see what he thinks on my outline. I’m eager to hear his opinion.

.x.

Yesterday I read an article about word of mouth on the web. It is hard to summarize because it is about an evaluation of a study about internet usage, on- and offline sources influencing purchase decisions. This means a lot of numbers and figures. In the end I suppose one could say “yes, user generated content (UGC) has an influence on purchase decisions”, dependent on the age and the kind of product category.

Article:

Word of Mouth on the Web: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Consumer Purchase Decisions

Cate Riegner

Journal of Advertising Research, December 2007, pp. 436-447

.x.

Last friday I met my professor whom I chose as supervising tutor for my master thesis. I presented a few mindmaps to him and outlined my research field.

We both agreed that it is absolutely necessary to concentrate on a more special question because illustrating the world of word of mouth would be too much. Because I’d like to include the online perspective of the topic, we thought about a title like “How to Create Word of Mouth Using Online Tools”.

That sounds still quite strange and I think I need to sharpen it.

Tonight I leave for Munich. That will be eight hours (for the return trip) to read more about the topic.

.x.

I’ve just been doing some research and had a quick peek on wikipedia (I know, it’s not scientific and so on). Here I found a nice word: sockpuppeting. This verb describes someone trying to manipulate a forum or whatever by a. entering a question under one pseudonym

Jimbo66: What is the best detergent for a car?

and b. answering the question with another pseudonym:

Johnny22: Hi Jimbo, I rely on detergent X. It works just perfect.

That’s sockpuppeting.

.x.

I just found a very interesting project via connectedmarketing. It is called brand tags and everyone who enters the website can write down his first idea about a brand. All these “ideas” are then displayed in some sort of tag cloud. It’s really amazing what others (despite it’s mostly an American way of view) think about a brand.

have fun:

LINK http://www.brandtags.net/

.x.

I read two interesting articles. While one deals with marketing manager’s misperception of WOM, the other one proofed the importance of customer loyalty (and resulting recommendations) for company growth.

Article 1:
The Buzz on Buzz
Renée Dye
Harvard Business Review November/December 2000, pp.139-146

Article 2:
The One Number You Need To Grow
Frederick F. Reicheld
Harvard Business Review December 2003, pp.46-54


taken from the buzz on buzz, HBR

.x.

This is my contribution to the blogosphere – the worldwide one. I got the clue that a blog requires a language that most people understand. Because of this, I decided to do everything in English from now on.

Oh yes, the master-thesis:

Yesterday we had a general holiday. All I did was my tax return for 2007.
I hate this time-eating bureaucracy.

More in the next article.

.x.

Weil wir in Deutschland sind und weil es Not tut – hier das obligatorische Impressum:

Dieses Blog wird von Lars Heyne, 40223 Düsseldorf betrieben.

Gemäß § 28 BDSG widerspreche ich jedweder kommerziellen Verwendung oder Weitergabe meiner Daten.

Dieses Blog ist Teil des World Wide Webs und dementsprechend mit fremden, sich jederzeit wandeln könnenden Webseiten verknüpft, die somit auch nicht diesem Verantwortungsbereich unterliegen und für die nachfolgende Informationen nicht gelten. Vor der Aufnahme von Links wurde einmalig geprüft, ob diese gegen die guten Sitten oder Gesetze verstoßen.

Die Inhalte meines Blogs werden sorgfältig geprüft und nach bestem Wissen erstellt, trotzdem besteht für die Inhalte kein Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, Aktualität, Qualität oder Richtigkeit.

Für Schäden, die durch das Vertrauen auf oder den Gebrauch der Inhalte dieses Blogs entstehen, kann daher keine Verantwortung übernommen werden.

Dies ist eine private Internetseite, die keine kommerziellen Absichten verfolgt.

Falls Sie ein rechtliches oder andersartiges Problem mit Blog-Inhalten haben, stehe ich Ihnen gerne unter purzel74 [at] web.de zur Verfügung.

.x.